As businesses increasingly rely on automation to streamline their workflows, Make.com (formerly Integromat) has become a popular choice for connecting apps and automating processes. However, with the evolving landscape of automation platforms, numerous alternatives have emerged that offer unique advantages, better pricing models, or specialized features. This comprehensive guide explores the best Make alternatives available in 2025, analyzing their strengths, weaknesses, pricing, and ideal use cases.
Why Consider Make Alternatives?
While Make.com is a robust platform, users often seek alternatives due to:
- Cost considerations: Make’s pricing can become expensive for high-volume operations
- Complexity: The visual interface, while powerful, can be overwhelming for beginners
- Limited customization: Some users need more flexibility than Make’s pre-built integrations offer
- Self-hosting requirements: Organizations wanting full control over their automation infrastructure
- Specialized features: Need for specific capabilities like advanced AI integration or enterprise security
Top 12 Make Alternatives in 2025
1. Zapier
Best for: Beginners and non-technical teams seeking plug-and-play automation
Zapier remains the industry leader in workflow automation, offering the most extensive app ecosystem and user-friendly interface.
Pros:
- Massive app library: Over 7,000+ integrations
- User-friendly interface: Intuitive setup process
- Strong community support: Extensive documentation and tutorials
- Reliable uptime: Enterprise-grade reliability
- Multi-step Zaps: Complex workflow capabilities
- AI-powered features: Built-in AI tools and ChatGPT integration
Cons:
- Expensive for high volume: Cost scales quickly with usage
- Limited customization: Less flexibility than code-based solutions
- Task-based pricing: Can become costly for data-heavy operations
- Basic error handling: Limited debugging capabilities compared to developer-focused tools
Pricing (2025):
| Plan | Price/Month | Tasks Included | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 tasks | 5 Zaps, 2-step workflows |
| Starter | $19.99 | 750 tasks | 20 Zaps, multi-step workflows |
| Professional | $49 | 2,000 tasks | Unlimited Zaps, webhooks, filters |
| Team | $69 | 2,000 tasks | Shared workspace, advanced admin |
| Company | $103.50 | 10,000 tasks | Advanced security, SSO |
Best Use Cases:
- Small to medium businesses
- Marketing automation
- Sales process optimization
- Non-technical team workflows
2. n8n
Best for: Developers and tech-savvy teams wanting maximum control and customization
n8n is an open-source automation platform that offers both self-hosted and cloud options, providing unparalleled flexibility for technical users.
Pros:
- Open source: Free to self-host with full source code access
- Unlimited workflows: No task limits when self-hosted
- Advanced customization: Custom code nodes and functions
- Data privacy: Complete control over data when self-hosted
- Visual workflow builder: Node-based interface similar to Make
- Strong AI integration: Built-in AI nodes and LLM support
- Developer-friendly: Git integration, version control, APIs
Cons:
- Technical complexity: Requires technical knowledge to set up and maintain
- Maintenance overhead: Self-hosting requires server management
- Smaller app ecosystem: Fewer pre-built integrations than Zapier
- Learning curve: More complex for non-technical users
- Self-hosting costs: Infrastructure and maintenance costs can add up
Pricing (2025):
| Option | Price/Month | Workflows | Executions | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted | Free | Unlimited | Unlimited | Developers with infrastructure |
| n8n Cloud Starter | $20 | 10 workflows | 2,500 executions | Small teams |
| n8n Cloud Pro | $50 | 50 workflows | 10,000 executions | Growing businesses |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited | Custom | Large organizations |
Best Use Cases:
- Development teams
- AI-heavy automations
- Data-sensitive organizations
- Custom integration requirements
3. Activepieces
Best for: Open-source enthusiasts wanting a modern, intuitive interface
Activepieces is a newer open-source automation platform that combines the flexibility of n8n with a more user-friendly interface.
Pros:
- Modern UI: Clean, intuitive interface
- Open source: Free to self-host
- Growing integrations: Rapidly expanding app ecosystem
- Good documentation: Well-maintained docs and tutorials
- Active development: Frequent updates and new features
- Docker support: Easy deployment and scaling
Cons:
- Newer platform: Less mature than established alternatives
- Limited integrations: Smaller app ecosystem compared to major players
- Community size: Smaller user community
- Enterprise features: Limited advanced features for large organizations
Pricing (2025):
- Self-hosted: Free (infrastructure costs apply)
- Cloud version: In development
- Support: Community-driven (paid support available)
Best Use Cases:
- Startups and small teams
- Organizations wanting modern open-source solutions
- Users seeking balance between simplicity and power
4. Integrately
Best for: Budget-conscious users seeking affordable automation
Integrately positions itself as a cost-effective alternative to Zapier and Make, offering competitive pricing with good functionality.
Pros:
- Affordable pricing: Lower cost per task than major competitors
- Pre-built automations: Ready-to-use automation templates
- Good app coverage: 1,100+ integrations
- User-friendly: Simple setup process
- Dedicated support: Responsive customer service
Cons:
- Limited advanced features: Fewer complex workflow options
- Smaller ecosystem: Less extensive than Zapier or Make
- Basic error handling: Limited debugging capabilities
- Feature limitations: Some advanced features require higher tiers
Pricing (2025):
| Plan | Price/Month | Tasks | Integrations | Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 tasks | Basic apps | Simple automations |
| Starter | $19.99 | 8,000 tasks | All apps | Multi-step workflows |
| Professional | $39 | 16,000 tasks | All apps | Advanced features |
| Growth | $79 | 32,000 tasks | All apps | Team collaboration |
| Business | $239 | 100,000 tasks | All apps | Enterprise features |
Best Use Cases:
- Small businesses with budget constraints
- Simple automation needs
- Teams wanting cost-effective scaling
5. Pipedream
Best for: Developers wanting code-first automation with serverless architecture
Pipedream combines the ease of visual workflow builders with the power of serverless computing and custom code.
Pros:
- Code integration: Native support for Node.js, Python, Go, Bash
- Serverless architecture: No infrastructure management
- Real-time triggers: Event-driven workflows
- Developer-friendly: Git integration, version control
- Generous free tier: Substantial free usage limits
- API-first approach: Strong REST API support
Cons:
- Technical learning curve: Requires programming knowledge
- Limited visual interface: Less intuitive for non-developers
- Execution time limits: Serverless constraints on long-running processes
- Debugging complexity: More complex error troubleshooting
Pricing (2025):
| Plan | Price/Month | Credits | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 3,000 credits | Basic workflows |
| Developer | $19 | 10,000 credits | Advanced features |
| Team | $49 | 25,000 credits | Collaboration tools |
| Business | $199 | 100,000 credits | Enterprise security |
Best Use Cases:
- Developer teams
- Complex data processing
- Custom API integrations
- Serverless-first organizations
6. Microsoft Power Automate
Best for: Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft ecosystem
Power Automate (formerly Microsoft Flow) provides deep integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure services.
Pros:
- Microsoft ecosystem: Deep Office 365 and Azure integration
- Enterprise security: Advanced security and compliance features
- AI capabilities: Built-in AI Builder and cognitive services
- Governance: Enterprise-grade administration and monitoring
- Desktop automation: RPA capabilities included
Cons:
- Microsoft lock-in: Best value requires Microsoft ecosystem
- Complex pricing: Multiple licensing models
- Learning curve: Interface can be overwhelming
- Limited non-Microsoft integrations: Fewer third-party apps
Pricing (2025):
| Plan | Price/Month | Flows | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Per user | $15 | Unlimited | Standard connectors |
| Per flow | $100 | 5 flows | Premium connectors |
| Process mining | $5,000 | Enterprise | Advanced analytics |
| RPA attended | $40 | Desktop automation | AI Builder |
Best Use Cases:
- Microsoft-centric organizations
- Enterprise automation
- Compliance-heavy industries
- Desktop automation needs
7. IFTTT (If This Then That)
Best for: Consumer-focused automation and IoT integrations
IFTTT specializes in simple, consumer-friendly automations with strong IoT and social media integration.
Pros:
- Simple setup: Extremely user-friendly interface
- IoT focus: Excellent smart home and device integrations
- Mobile-first: Strong mobile app experience
- Social media: Great for social platform automation
- Free tier: Generous free plan for basic use
Cons:
- Limited complexity: No multi-step workflows in free tier
- Consumer focus: Less suitable for business automation
- Basic features: Limited advanced functionality
- Slow updates: Less frequent feature additions
Pricing (2025):
| Plan | Price/Month | Applets | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 5 applets | Basic automation |
| Pro | $3.99 | 20 applets | Multi-step, faster execution |
| Pro+ | $9.99 | Unlimited | Advanced features, priority support |
Best Use Cases:
- Personal automation
- Smart home integration
- Social media management
- Simple consumer workflows
8. Relay.app
Best for: Teams wanting collaborative automation with human-in-the-loop workflows
Relay focuses on collaborative automation that combines automated processes with human decision points.
Pros:
- Human-in-the-loop: Built-in approval and review steps
- Team collaboration: Shared workflows and permissions
- AI integration: Native AI features and GPT integration
- User-friendly: Intuitive interface for non-technical users
- Generous free tier: Good value for small teams
Cons:
- Newer platform: Less mature ecosystem
- Limited integrations: Smaller app library
- Feature development: Some advanced features still in development
Pricing (2025):
| Plan | Price/Month | Runs | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 runs | Basic workflows |
| Starter | $8 | 5,000 runs | Advanced features |
| Professional | $20 | 25,000 runs | Team collaboration |
| Business | $60 | 100,000 runs | Enterprise features |
Best Use Cases:
- Approval workflows
- Content review processes
- Team collaboration scenarios
- Quality control automation
9. Lindy.ai
Best for: AI-powered automation and intelligent workflow orchestration
Lindy focuses on AI-enhanced automation, providing intelligent agents that can handle complex decision-making.
Pros:
- AI-first approach: Built-in AI decision making
- Natural language: Configure workflows using plain English
- Intelligent routing: AI-powered workflow optimization
- Learning capabilities: Improves over time based on usage
Cons:
- Newer platform: Limited track record
- AI dependency: Requires trust in AI decision-making
- Pricing transparency: Less clear pricing structure
- Integration ecosystem: Smaller than established players
Pricing (2025):
- Contact for pricing: Custom pricing based on usage and requirements
- Free trial: Available for evaluation
Best Use Cases:
- AI-enhanced workflows
- Intelligent content processing
- Dynamic decision trees
- Organizations embracing AI automation
10. Workato
Best for: Enterprise-grade integration and automation
Workato provides enterprise-focused integration and automation capabilities with strong security and governance features.
Pros:
- Enterprise features: Advanced security, governance, monitoring
- Recipe marketplace: Pre-built integration templates
- Scalability: Handles high-volume enterprise workloads
- API management: Comprehensive API integration tools
- Compliance: SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA compliance
Cons:
- Enterprise pricing: Expensive for small businesses
- Complexity: Can be overwhelming for simple use cases
- Sales-driven: Requires sales consultation for pricing
Pricing (2025):
- Contact for pricing: Enterprise pricing model
- Minimum commitment: Typically requires annual contracts
- Free trial: Available with sales engagement
Best Use Cases:
- Large enterprise automation
- Complex system integrations
- Compliance-heavy industries
- High-volume data processing
11. Gumloop
Best for: Tech-enabled teams wanting AI-integrated automation
Gumloop is designed for technical teams that want to combine traditional automation with large language models and AI capabilities.
Pros:
- AI integration: Built-in LLM and AI model support
- Technical focus: Designed for developer workflows
- Modern architecture: Cloud-native, scalable platform
- Free to start: Generous free tier for evaluation
Cons:
- Newer platform: Limited market presence and maturity
- Technical requirement: Best suited for technical users
- Limited documentation: Fewer learning resources available
Pricing (2025):
- Free tier: Available for getting started
- Paid plans: Usage-based pricing model
- Contact for details: Custom enterprise pricing
Best Use Cases:
- AI-enhanced workflows
- Developer and technical teams
- Modern tech stack integration
- Experimental automation projects
12. Nekton.ai
Best for: No-code users seeking visual automation building
Nekton provides a visual, drag-and-drop interface for building automations without technical knowledge.
Pros:
- Visual builder: Intuitive drag-and-drop interface
- No-code approach: Designed for non-technical users
- Affordable: Competitive pricing structure
- Quick setup: Fast automation deployment
Cons:
- Limited complexity: Restricted advanced workflow options
- Smaller ecosystem: Fewer integrations than major platforms
- Market position: Less established in the market
Pricing (2025):
- Free tier: Basic automation capabilities
- Pro plans: Starting around $15/month
- Enterprise: Custom pricing for large organizations
Best Use Cases:
- Non-technical teams
- Simple automation requirements
- Budget-conscious small businesses
- Quick prototype and testing
Comparison Matrix
| Platform | Best For | Pricing Start | Learning Curve | Integrations | Open Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Beginners, extensive integrations | $19.99/month | Easy | 7,000+ | No |
| n8n | Developers, customization | Free (self-hosted) | Hard | 400+ | Yes |
| Activepieces | Modern open-source | Free (self-hosted) | Medium | 200+ | Yes |
| Integrately | Budget-conscious | $19.99/month | Easy | 1,100+ | No |
| Pipedream | Developers, code integration | $19/month | Hard | 2,000+ | No |
| Power Automate | Microsoft ecosystem | $15/month | Medium | 1,000+ | No |
| IFTTT | Consumer, IoT | $3.99/month | Very Easy | 700+ | No |
| Relay.app | Team collaboration | $8/month | Easy | 100+ | No |
| Lindy.ai | AI-powered automation | Custom | Medium | Limited | No |
| Workato | Enterprise | Custom | Hard | 1,000+ | No |
Feature Comparison
Advanced Features Matrix
| Feature | Zapier | n8n | Make | Activepieces | Pipedream | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Workflow Builder | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Partial | ✅ |
| Custom Code Support | Limited | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Error Handling | Basic | Advanced | Advanced | Medium | Advanced | Advanced |
| Version Control | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Self-Hosting | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| AI Integration | Basic | Advanced | Medium | Basic | Advanced | Advanced |
| Real-time Triggers | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Webhook Support | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multi-step Workflows | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Team Collaboration | ✅ | Limited | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Cost Analysis: Total Cost of Ownership
Small Business Scenario (1,000-5,000 tasks/month)
| Platform | Monthly Cost | Setup Time | Maintenance | Total Monthly TCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier Professional | $49 | Low | None | $49 |
| n8n Self-hosted | $30 (server) | High | Medium | $80-120 |
| Make Basic | $9 | Medium | Low | $15-25 |
| Integrately Starter | $19.99 | Low | None | $19.99 |
Enterprise Scenario (50,000+ tasks/month)
| Platform | Monthly Cost | Setup Cost | Maintenance Cost | Annual TCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier Company | $1,000+ | $5,000 | $2,000/year | $19,000+ |
| n8n Enterprise | $2,000+ | $20,000 | $50,000/year | $94,000+ |
| Workato | $3,000+ | $25,000 | $30,000/year | $91,000+ |
| Power Automate | $500-2,000 | $15,000 | $25,000/year | $65,000+ |
Decision Framework
Choose Zapier if:
- Non-technical team
- Need maximum integrations
- Value reliability over customization
- Budget allows for per-task pricing
- Want minimal setup time
Choose n8n if:
- Have technical expertise
- Need maximum customization
- Data privacy is critical
- High-volume automation needs
- Want to avoid vendor lock-in
Choose Make if:
- Want visual workflow building
- Need complex logic and branching
- Prefer operational-based pricing
- Balance between power and usability
- Medium technical proficiency
Choose Integrately if:
- Budget is primary concern
- Simple to medium automation needs
- Want Zapier-like experience at lower cost
- Small team with basic requirements
Choose Power Automate if:
- Microsoft ecosystem user
- Enterprise security requirements
- Need desktop automation (RPA)
- Compliance is critical
- Already have Microsoft licenses
Migration Considerations
When switching from Make to an alternative, consider:
Data Migration
- Export capabilities: Most platforms allow workflow export
- Manual recreation: Workflows typically need to be rebuilt
- Data mapping: Field mapping may differ between platforms
- Testing requirements: Thorough testing needed post-migration
Timeline Planning
- Small setups: 1-2 weeks for simple migrations
- Complex workflows: 1-3 months for enterprise migrations
- Parallel running: Consider running both platforms temporarily
- Training time: Factor in team learning curve
Risk Mitigation
- Backup strategy: Maintain backups of critical workflows
- Rollback plan: Prepare to revert if issues arise
- Incremental migration: Move workflows gradually
- Documentation: Document all custom configurations
Conclusion
The automation platform landscape in 2025 offers diverse options for every need and budget. While Make.com remains a solid choice, the alternatives provide compelling advantages:
- For beginners: Zapier remains the gold standard with its extensive integrations and user-friendly interface
- For developers: n8n offers unmatched customization and cost control through self-hosting
- For budget-conscious users: Integrately provides excellent value without sacrificing core functionality
- For enterprises: Power Automate and Workato deliver the governance and security features large organizations require
- For AI enthusiasts: Newer platforms like Lindy.ai and enhanced AI features in established platforms point to the future
The key to choosing the right alternative lies in honestly assessing your team’s technical capabilities, budget constraints, integration requirements, and long-term automation strategy. Consider starting with free trials or freemium tiers to test platforms before committing to paid plans.
Remember that the “best” platform is the one that your team will actually use effectively, not necessarily the most feature-rich or technically sophisticated option. Factor in adoption rates, training requirements, and ongoing maintenance when making your final decision.
As automation continues to evolve, expect to see more AI integration, better governance tools, and increasingly sophisticated workflow capabilities across all platforms. The investment in learning a modern automation platform today will pay dividends as these tools become even more central to business operations in the years ahead.
Leave a Reply